I agree that the clearer the description, the easier it is for the contractor to understand the task and fulfill it. But on the other hand, there is always room for changes and adjustments, as new ideas may arise in the process. I think it's important to find a balance between detail and flexibility. What do you think of this idea, to start with a general description and then refine the details as you go along? This could reduce the risk of mistakes.

In fact, a detailed task description is the basis of success in outsourcing, especially when it comes to complex projects like AI. If you don't specify all the details, you risk getting a result that doesn't meet your expectations. The more precisely you describe the tasks, the easier it will be for the contractor to understand exactly what is required of him. This helps avoid a lot of misunderstandings and inefficient iterations. Of course, an overly rigid and overloaded description can also create problems, as it can limit the creativity of developers. However, in general, clear and understandable requirements provide transparency and allow for better management of the process. It's important to include not only technical but also business goals so that the development team understands exactly how their work fits into the big picture. It's also worth defining success criteria upfront so that you understand how to evaluate the outcome. If you don't have experience in preparing technical specifications, there are services that can help. For example, link offers a platform where you can find experienced professionals and get help in drafting requirements that fit your needs. This is a great way to avoid many mistakes at the start of a project.